My company became a farm team for big tech. I used it to my advantage.

Share
My company became a farm team for big tech. I used it to my advantage.

Why I stopped selling people on staying, and what I built instead.

When a good person walks out the door, all your time training them walks out with them.

That was the hardest punch in the gut from 20 years as a business owner. Not sales. Not cash flow. Tenure.

My best people stayed about four years. Every time one moved on, I had that sinking feeling of starting from scratch.

A farm team for big tech

For years I felt Harley Oliver was a farm team for the big tech companies landing in Toronto.

I couldn't compete on salary or brand vanity. So one by one, I lost good people. Handpicked out of my team, straight into companies I couldn't outbid. I'd spent the time training them one on one, exposing them to every level of the work, on the ground floor with them every day.

For a long time I treated that as a failure.

I stopped selling people on staying

Then I changed my thinking. Staying is the one promise a boutique can't actually keep.

So I stopped making it. The pitch became: it's not about working here. It's about where you go next.

If someone is leaving in four years anyway, the honest offer isn't loyalty. It's leverage. Four good years, and you leave more valuable than you arrived.

That meant work you can show, named clients, and your contribution made clear. Range instead of one slice of one product. In front of a client in year one, presenting, defending decisions, hearing no. A reference that still means something five years later.

No corporate ladder or pecking order. Collaboration from day one. At some point the ceiling here is real, and when you hit it, I'd rather help you find the next thing than watch you quietly check out for a year first.

A lot of people who now lead decisions at these brands started with us:

Harley Oliver → Apple
Harley Oliver → Twitter
Harley Oliver → WealthSimple
Harley Oliver → their own startup (three of them)

I'd post their names, but that's their story to tell.

The part I let slide

Reframing the offer fixed how I felt about people leaving. It didn't fix the cost.

I was a process guy. It's what I sold clients for years. But creative work never repeats, so inside my own shop I let it slide. The knowledge lived in people's heads, and it left when they did.

Then AI happened.

Owners started asking for it. Not the systems. The agents. But the thing that makes AI useful in a business is the same thing that stops a resignation from resetting you to zero: the work has to be written down and run by the business, not carried by one person.

It's also what raises your company's value, gets you the exit, or simply lets you bugger off and collect dividends while you're sipping piña coladas.

I still speak to owners who are delusional about what their company is worth. Some of them always will be. But I'm starting to see the turn.

If you run a small team

Be honest about the ceiling. People can tell when you're selling a future you can't deliver, and they leave quietly instead of openly.

Make the offer about what they'll leave with. Work they can show. Range. Real client exposure.

And get the work out of people's heads. If a resignation feels like starting from scratch, that isn't a people problem. It's a systems problem.

Your best people will leave. Build the business so they take their growth with them, not your know-how.